SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(1) M. Subba Reddy, (2) K. V. N. Acharyulu
Vs
A.P. State Road Transport Corporation
(1) Civil Appeal No. 4908 OF 1999; (2) Appeal (Civil) 4907 of 1999
(V. N. Khare (CJI) and S. H. Kapadia)
12/04/2004
JUDGMENT
KAPADIA, J.
The civil appeals herein raise a common point of law i.e. fitment of the
promotees in the integrated seniority list. The posts of Assistant Traffic
Manager (for short "ATM) and Assistant Mechanical Engineer (for short
"AME) are Class-I Junior Scale Officers posts. It is the case of the
appellants that for several years, due to ban on recruitment, promotions were
made from lower feeder posts even in excess of the ratio of 1:1 under A.P.
State Road Transport Corporation Employees (Recruitment) Regulations, 1966
(hereinafter referred to as "the recruitment regulations). It is the case
of the appellants that whenever direct recruitment was not possible within a
short period and when administrative exigencies warranted the filling of posts,
like the one in the instant case, promotions were made either on ad hoc or on
temporary basis and in course of time they were regularized. M. Subba Reddy,
appellant herein, was appointed as a Traffic Apprentice on 10.8.1971 in the
Corporation. He was promoted temporarily on 31.1.1983 as ATM vide Office Order
dated 10.1.1983 and regularized on 27.12.1986 vide order dated 9.9.1988. He was
confirmed on 1.4.1987 as ATM. It is the case of the appellants that while they
were senior to direct recruits, who entered the above posts in 1988, 1990 etc.,
in the impugned integrated seniority list dated 10.11.1994, they have been
placed below the direct recruits.
The appellants contend that when their promotions were regularized, the direct
recruits were not even born on the cadre of ATMs/AMEs and, therefore, there was
no reason for placing them below the direct recruits. Per contra, it is the
case of direct recruits that the integrated seniority list is in consonance
with the quota rule of 1:1 under the statutory rules mentioned supra.
Before coming to the arguments advanced on both sides, we notice the relevant
provisions of recruitment regulations framed by the corporation under section
45 of the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950. For the purposes of deciding
this matter, we quote herein below the relevant provisions of the recruitment
regulations:
"3. Appointment and qualifications:
1) Appointment to the posts in the Corporation shall be made
a) by direct recruitment; or
b) by promotion; or
c) by transfer or deputation of an official already in the service of a
Department of the Central or State Government or a State Transport Undertaking.
2) The method of recruitment to each post specified in column 2 of Annexure-A
shall be as shown in the corresponding entry in column (3) thereof and the
qualifications prescribed for each such post shall be as shown in the
corresponding entry in column (4). 3) Notwithstanding anything in Clause
(2) the Corporation may at any time, appoint suitable officers of the State or
Central Government or any State Transport Undertaking to any of the posts
specified in Annexure-A on 'Foreign Service' terms.
4) Where suitable departmental candidates are not available for promotion to
any of the posts specified in Annexure-A where the posts are to be filled by
promotion only, such posts may be filled by direct recruitment by selection
provided that recruitment to all the higher posts from the lower posts shall be
made by way of promotion and resort had to direct recruitment only when
suitable and qualified persons are not available for promotions.
17).Temporary appointment:
(1) Where it is necessary in administrative interests owing to an emergency
which has arisen, to fill immediately a vacancy in a post borne on the cadre of
a service and if it is likely that there would be undue delay in making any
appointment in accordance with these regulations, the appointing authority may
appoint a person temporarily otherwise than in accordance with these
regulations, until a person is appointed in accordance with these regulation,
provided the post is not one which is reserved to be filled by promotion.
(2) No appointment under clause (1) shall ordinarily be made of a person who
does not possess the qualifications, if any, prescribed for the said post. Every
person who does not possess such qualifications and who has been or is
appointed under this clause shall be replaced as soon as possible by an
approved candidate.
(3) Where it is necessary to fill a short vacancy in a post borne on the cadre
of a service and the appointment of the person entitled to such appointment
under the regulations or orders in force would involve excessive expenditure on
travelling allowance or exceptional administrative inconvenience, the
appointing authority may appoint any other person who possesses the
qualifications, if any, prescribed for the said post.
(4) A person appointed under clause (1) shall, whether or not he possess the
qualification prescribed for appointment to the post to which he is appointed,
be replaced as soon as possible by an employee or an approved candidate as the
case may be, who is qualified to hold the post under the regulations or orders
in force.
(5) A person appointed under clause (1) or clause (3) shall not be entitled by
reason only of such appointment to any preferential claim to future appointment
to such post or category of posts.
(6) Notwithstanding anything in these regulations, if and when a temporary post
is created as an addition to the cadre of a service and the holder thereof is
required by the corporation to possess any special qualifications, knowledge or
experience, any person who possesses such qualifications, knowledge or
experience, and is considered to be the best suited to discharge the duties of
such post may, irrespective of other considerations, be appointed to that post
by the appointing authority but the person so appointed shall not by reason
only of such appointment be regarded as a probationer in such service, class,
category nor shall be acquired thereby any preferential right to future
appointment to such service, class, category or posts.
18).Date of Commencement of probation of persons appointed temporarily:
If a person, having been appointed temporarily under clauses (1), (3) or (6) of
regulation 17 to a post borne on the cadre of any service, or having been
appointed to any services otherwise than in accordance with the regulations
governing appointment thereto is subsequently appointed to the service in
accordance with these regulations, he shall commence his probation from the
date of such subsequent appointment or from such earlier date (not being
earlier than the date of his first appointment on a temporary basis) as the
appointing authority may determine. He shall also be eligible to draw
increments in the time scale of pay applicable to him from the date of
commencement of his probation but shall not be entitled to arrears of pay
unless otherwise ordered by the corporation.
30). Temporary Promotion:
(1)(i) Where it is necessary in the administrative interest to fill emergently
a vacancy in a post borne on the cadre of a higher category in a service or
class by promotion from lower category and if the filling of such vacancy in
accordance with these regulations is likely to result in undue delay, the
appointing authority may promote a person temporarily otherwise than in
accordance with these regulations.
(ii) No person who does not possess the qualifications, if any, prescribed for
the said service, class, or category shall ordinarily be promoted under sub-clause
(i). Every person who has been or is promoted under sub-clause (i) shall be
replaced as soon as possible by promoting a person possessing such
qualifications.
(2) Where it is necessary to fill a short vacancy in a post borne on the cadre
of a higher category in a service or a class, by promotion from lower category
and the appointment of a person who is eligible for such promotion under these
regulation, would involve excessive expenditure on traveling allowance of
exceptional administrative inconvenience, the appointing authority may promote
any other person possessing the qualifications, if any, prescribed for the
post.
(3) A person promoted under sub-clause (i) of clause (1), whether or not he
possesses the qualification prescribed for the service, class or category to
which he is promoted shall as soon as possible be replaced by a member of the
service who is eligible to hold the post under the regulations or orders in
force.
(4) A person promoted under clauses (1) or (2) of regulation 30 shall not be
regarded as a probationer in the higher category or be entitled by reason only
of such promotion to any preferential claim to future promotion to such higher
category.
(5) The appointing authority shall have the power to revert to a lower category
or post any person promoted under clause (1) or (2) of regulation 30 at any
time without assigning any reason and without notice.
(6) If any person referred to in clause (4) is subsequently promoted to the
higher category in accordance with these regulations, he shall commence his
probation in such category from the date of such subsequent promotion or from
such earlier date as the appointing authority may in its discretion determine.
He shall also be eligible to draw increments in the time scale of pay applicable
to him from the date of commencement of his probation but shall not be entitled
to arrears of pay unless otherwise ordered.
34. If in any of the following categories a sufficient number of approved
candidates who have successfully completed their training is not available for
filling posts reserved to be filled by direct recruitment such posts may be
filled temporarily by departmental promotion until approved candidates who have
successfully completed their training become available to replace the promotees
and the reverted person shall subsequently be considered for reproofing against
the quota of vacancies reserved for being filled by promotion.
(a) Asstt. Mechanical Engineer and Asstt. Works Manager.
(b) Asst. Traffic Manager
(c) Chargeman
(d) Traffic Inspector Grade II and Head Depot Clerk.
(e) Artisans.
Item-3 of Annexure 'A' (Section-B) Class-I Jr. Scale Service:
"3. Assistant Traffic Manager. In a unit of four:
1) The first and third vacancy shall be filled in by appointing of an officer
under training, who has successfully completed his training and the second and
fourth by promotion of a Chief Inspector.
2) If a suitable candidate is not available in a particular category for
filling up a vacancy reserved for that category, the vacancy may be filled in
by a suitable candidate from the other categories.
3) If no suitable candidate is available in any of the categories mentioned
above, the post may be filled in by direct recruitment by selection.
Qualifications:
1) For Promotion:
The Chief Inspector must have put in not less than 5 years of service as such.
For Direct Recruitment: The Candidate
a) must hold a degree in Mechanical Engineering from a recognised University or
have passed sections 'A' & 'B' of the Associate Membership Examination of
the Institution of Engineers (India) or hold a diploma or a certificate
recognized by the Institution of Engineers (India) as exempting him from
Section 'A' & 'B' of their Associate Membership Examination.
b) must have had experience for not less then four years as Traffic Executive
in large size passenger road transport organization exclusive of the period of
training, if any, preference will be given to a candidate who is a graduate
member of the Indian Institution of Road Transport or any other recognised
Institution of Transport; And
c) must not be above 30 years of age as on Ist July of the year in which the
recruitment is made." *
We also quote herein below regulation 3 of Employees Service Regulations, 1964
(hereinafter referred to as "the service regulations"):
"3. Seniority:
(a) The "Seniority" of a person in service, class, category or grade
shall unless he has been reduced to a lower rank as a punishment, be determined
by the date of his first appointment to such service, class, category or grade.
If any portion of the service of such person does not count towards probation
his seniority shall be determined by the date of commencement of his service
which counts towards probation.
(b) The appointing authority may, at the time of passing an order appointing
two or more persons simultaneously to a service fix the order of preference
among them; and where such order has been fixed seniority shall be determined
in accordance with it.
(c) The transfer of a person from one category or grade of a service to another
category or grade carrying the same pay or scale of pay shall not be treated as
a first appointment to the latter for purposes of seniority and the seniority
of a person so transferred shall be determined with reference to the date of
his first appointment to the category or grade from which he was transferred.
Where any difficulty or doubt arises in applying this regulation, seniority
shall be determined by the appointing authority.
(d) Where a member of any service, class, category or grade, is reduced to a
lower service class, category or grade, he shall be placed at the top of the
latter unless the authority ordering such reduction directs that he shall take
rank in such lower service, class, category or grade next below any specified
member thereof." *
A bare reading of the above regulations indicate that under service regulation
3, the seniority is reckonable from the date of appointment to a service or a
grade. On the other hand, regulation 3 of the recruitment regulations deals
with the method and manner in which the appointments shall be made to various
posts. It states that appointments can be made by direct recruitment,
promotions and transfer. The method of recruitment to each post is specified in
column 2 of Appendix- A to the recruitment regulations as shown in the
corresponding column 3. Therefore, one has to read regulation 3 of the
recruitment regulations with Appendix-A in order to ascertain the method of
recruitment to each post. Item 3 quoted above relates to method of recruitment
to the post of Assistant Traffic Manager (ATM). Under item-3 (1), it is
stipulated that in a unit of four vacancies, the first and third vacancies
shall be filled by direct recruits whereas the second and fourth vacancies
shall be filled by promotees. It further provides that if a suitable candidate
is not available in a particular category for filling up a vacancy reserved for
that category, the vacancy may be filled in by a suitable candidate from the
other category. Regulation 17 of the recruitment regulations deal with
temporary appointments, the sole criteria being undue delay in making of
regular appointments. Regulation 18 specifies that if a person appointed to a
temporary post under regulation 17 is subsequently appointed to the service in
accordance with the regulations, his probation shall commence only from the
date of such subsequent appointment in accordance with the regulations.
Regulation 17 deals with power to make temporary appointments whereas
regulation 30 deals with the power to make temporary promotions. Regulation
30(1) stipulates that the appointing authority may promote a person
temporarily, otherwise than in accordance with the regulations, in cases where
administrative exigency requires the appointing authority to immediately fill
in a vacancy in the cadre of a higher category. Regulation 30(3) specifies
further that the temporary promotee covered by regulation 30(1) shall as soon
as possible be replaced by a member of the service eligible to hold the post
under the regulations. Regulation 30(4) stipulates that the temporary promotee
shall not be regarded as the probationer in the higher category; neither shall
he have any preferential claim to future promotion in the higher category.
Regulation 30(6) states that if a temporary promotee is subsequently promoted
to the higher category in accordance with the regulations, his probation shall
commence in the higher category only from the date of subsequent promotion in
the higher category and he shall not be entitled to any benefits for the period
when he was a temporary promotee. Regulation 34 applies to posts reserved only
to be filled by direct recruits.
Reading item 3 of Appendix-A (Section-B) with regulation 34, it is clear that
filling up of the posts reserved for direct recruits by departmental promotees
has to be on temporary basis under regulation 30 and as soon as eligible
candidates from direct recruits quota become available, they are to replace the
temporarily promotees.
Regulation 3 of the Service Regulations inter alia states that seniority shall
be determined by the date of first appointment to such service, class, category
or grade. In the present case, regulation 3 of the service regulations has been
pressed into service by the appellants, who have urged that their seniority
shall be determined on the basis of the date of appointment. However, one has
to read regulation 3 of the service regulations with regulations 30 and 34 of
the recruitment regulations. In the present case, the appellants-promotees were
promoted to the posts of ATMs/AMEs temporarily under regulation 30 as there
were no direct recruits available. They were promoted subject to being reverted
to substantive posts on approved candidates becoming available.
Regulation 34(6) states that the revertees shall subsequently be considered for
repromotion against the quota of vacancies reserved for promotees. Therefore,
in the present case, one has to read regulation 3 of the service regulations
with regulations 30 and 34 of the recruitment regulations. It is only when such
revertees are repromoted as per regulation 34, they can be deemed to have been
appointed to the post of ATM or AME.
Therefore, when the appellants were tentatively appointed to the post of ATMs/AMEs
originally for want of direct recruits and to the posts reserved for direct
recruits, it cannot be said that they were first appointed to that category
within the meaning of regulation 3 of the service regulations. Therefore, in so
far as posts reserved for direct recruits are concerned, the temporary
promotions cannot be said to be first appointments to that category. It follows
that seniority had to be fixed between the direct recruits and the promotees
strictly in accordance with the quota provided for in Item3 of Appendix-A
(Section-B).
Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellants submitted that the appellants had a right to be promoted within
their quota during the years 1981 to 1987, when vacancies for promotees quota
became available.
During this period, no direct recruits were available. Direct recruits became
available in July 1988, November, 1990 and June, 1992. Appellant M. Subba Reddy
was regularized from 27.12.1986 vide order dated 9.9.1998, when no direct
recruits were available and, therefore, it was improper for corporation to
place direct recruits above the promotees. It is the case of the appellants
that the direct recruits cannot claim appointments from the date of the vacancy
in their quota before their selection. It has been contended that Item-3 of
Appendix-A (Section-B) prescribes the method of recruitment in the manner in
which vacancy is allocated. According to the learned counsel it does not
involve rota for the purposes of seniority. It prescribes only quota,
therefore, rota cannot be implied. It was urged that seniority is dealt with
only by regulation 3 of the service regulations, 1964 and not by regulation 34
of the recruitment regulations, 1966. Reliance was placed in this connection on
regulation 34 as amended on 15.9.1995. It was submitted that in view of the
said amendments, Appendix-A refers to only allocation of vacancy and not for
determination of seniority. It was to be determined only by regulation 3 of the
service regulations. The non-availability of candidates in a particular
category, it was urged, may be on account of ban on recruitment or on any other
ground. Therefore, in the present case, where promotees were regularized in the
promotion quota when direct recruits were not available, the quota in item-3(1)
of Appendix-A will not apply. It was submitted that in any event, allocation of
vacancy under the said clause was not rigid and it cannot be a basis for
denying seniority to the promotees from the date of regularization. Reliance
was place on the judgment of this Court in the case of The Direct Recruit
Class- II Engineering Officers' Association & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
& Ors. Reported in].
We do not find any merit in the above arguments. Appellants have not challenged
the validity of the above regulations. As stated above, it has been contended
before us on behalf of the appellants that item-3(1) of Appendix-A (Section-B)
prescribes method of recruitment and the manner in which vacancy is to be
allocated, which does not involve rotation for the purposes of seniority; that
item-3(1) of Appendix-A (Section-B) prescribes only quota and rota cannot be
implied. However, the appellants before the High Court unequivocally submitted
that under the above regulations, promotions and direct recruitments were
required to be made in the ratio of 1:1 and that the said regulations provided
for a cycle in which vacancies were to be rotated. [See: Affidavit of M.]
Subba Reddy dated 28.12.1994]. In the said affidavit, it is further submitted
that in the absence of direct recruits, the slots reserved for direct recruits
were liable to be adjusted with the promotees immediately and subsequently
arrived direct recruits should be given their positions in the seniority list
subsequently in a bunch. In our view, the averments of the appellants before
the High Court, if accepted, would result in complete violation of the quota
and rota rule embodied in the above regulations, which cannot be permitted. As
stated above, appellants were promoted originally subject to the conditions
envisaged in regulation 34 and, therefore, they cannot claim seniority by
ignoring the said regulations and on the basis of their officiating services.
They were promoted temporarily under regulation 30 which provides for ad hoc
promotions. Regulation 34 ensures induction of qualified direct recruits. But
for regulation 34, candidates from feeder posts would be temporarily promoted
to the slots reserved for direct recruits and on their regularization, the
quota prescribed for direct recruits will be defeated. Regulation 34 has been
enacted to protect quota prescribed for direct recruits. As stated above,
regulation 3 of the service regulations has to be read with regulations 30 and
34 of the said recruitment regulations. The appellants were promoted on
temporary basis under regulation 30 with the clear understanding that the
period of officiation will not give them any right over direct recruits in
future. It is for this reason that regulation 30 (6) states that if a temporarily
promotee is subsequently promoted in accordance with the regulations, his
probation will commence in the higher category only from the date of subsequent
promotions. For the same reason, regulation 34 states that revertees shall be
subsequently considered for repromotion against the quota of vacancies reserved
for being filled by promotion. Therefore, regulation 34 protects the quota
prescribed for direct recruits. On reading regulation 3 of the service
regulations with regulations 30 and 34 of the recruitment regulations, it
becomes clear that neither the date of promotion nor the date of selection is
the criteria for fixation of seniority. The fixation of seniority under the
above regulations depends upon the number of vacancies falling in a particular
category. Therefore, the rule of rota is inbuilt in the quota prescribed for
direct recruits and for promotees in terms of item-3 of Appendix-A (Section-B)
to the recruitment regulations. In the present case, the above regulations
prescribe a quota of 1:1, which leads to rota for confirmation. The fixation of
seniority under the above regulations depends upon the number of vacancies
against which promotees became due for promotion. In the case of Devendra
Prasad Sharma v. State of Mizoram & Ors. reported in [ 0], rule 25(iii) stated that the relative seniority of
direct recruits and of promotees shall be determined according to rotation of
vacancies between direct recruits and promotees based on the quotas of
vacancies reserved for direct recruitment and promotion. Rule 25(iii) is
similar to Item-3 (1) of Appendix-A (Section-B). It was held by this Court that
in cases where there is rotation of vacancies between direct recruits and
promotees based on quota of vacancies, the rotation has to be considered in
accordance with the vacancies as and when they accrue under the rules.
Therefore, the quota rule needs to be strictly adhered to, if not, it would
lead to absurdity. If the contention of the appellants is accepted, it would
mean that the entire group of direct recruits will have to be placed below the
entire group of promotees. We are of the opinion that having fixed the quota
between the two sources of recruitment, there is no discretion with the
corporation to alter the quota or to deviate from the quota. In the
circumstances, there is no merit in the argument of the appellants that
item-3(1) of Appendix-A (Section-B) prescribes only quota and not rota and that
the said item was not for determination of seniority. In the case of S.G.
Jaisinghani v. Union of India & Ors. reported in ], this Court held
that having fixed the quota between two sources of recruitment, it is not open
to the government to alter the quota or to deviate from the quota. In the case
of Union of India & Ors. v. S.D. Gupta & Ors. reported in 0], the respondents were promotees Extra Assistant
Directors (Class-III) in Central Water Commission Engineering Class-I Service.
The recruitment rules were made w.e.f. 15.10.1965. In the earlier litigation,
the tribunal found that one Shri V.P. Misra, Extra Assistant Director was
promoted on ad hoc basis on 31.3.1978 and he was required to be confirmed with
effect from the date on which vacancy was available to him in the quota of
promotees. The vacancy had admittedly arisen in the quota of promotees on
3.5.1979. Shri V.P. Misra was fitted in that vacancy. While doing so, the
department applied principle of rota and quota and determined the inter-se
seniority of promotees and direct recruits.
Consequently, the promotees were pushed down in the order of seniority which
led to second round of litigation. The question which arose for determination
before this Court was whether fitment of seniority determined by the department
was in accordance with the rules. The Court found that 60% of the vacancies
were to be filled by direct recruits and 40% by promotees. Among the 40% quota,
there was a further demarcation in the ratio of 25% and 15% between promotees
and transferees. Admittedly, the promotees were entitled to their fitment
within 25% quota. Vacancies for the promotees had arisen on 3.5.1979 and,
therefore, V.P. Misra was entitled to that vacancy which arose on that date.
However, as stated above, in the integrated list, the promotees were pushed
down.
It was contended on behalf of the promotees that the direct recruits were not
born in the service when the promotees were promoted and equity requires that
the promotees cannot be pushed down. This Court rejected the said argument by
observing that the object of direct recruitment is to blend talent and
experience. So long as the system continues, consequences were inevitable.
Although, the direct recruits were recruited later, their fitment in the order
of seniority had to be determined with reference to rota and quota prescribed
under the rules. In such a case, there was no illegality even when promotees
were pushed downwards in the order of seniority. In our view, the judgment of
this Court in the case of S.D. Gupta's case (supra) squarely applies to the
facts of the present case.
Appellants have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of The
Direct Recruit Class-II Engineering Officers' Association's case (supra). In
that matter, an unusual situation had developed under which the rota and quota
system had broken down. The promotees had worked for twenty years without being
reverted and in view of that fact, the Constitution Bench of this Court
confirmed the principles of counting towards seniority, the period of
continuous officiation. The said judgment has no application to the facts of this
case. In the present case, the argument of the appellants is that on the date
when the appellants were regularized, there were no direct recruits available
and consequently they cannot be pushed down in the integrated seniority list.
Hence, the judgment of this Court in the case of The Direct Recruit Class-II
Engineering Officers' Association (supra) has no application to the present
case. In fact, in the later judgment of this Court in the case of State of West
Bengal & Ors. v. Aghore Nath Dey & Ors. reported in [ ], it has
been held, relying on the judgment in the case of The Direct Recruit Class-II
Engineering Officers' Association (supra), that seniority has to be counted
from the date of initial appointment and not from the date of confirmation provided
the initial appointment is according to the rules. But the corollary to the
above proposition is that where initial appointment is only ad hoc and not
according to rules, the officiation cannot be taken into account for
considering the seniority. The ratio of the judgment of this Court in the case
of Aghore Nath Dey (supra) is that the benefit of ad hoc or temporary service
is not admissible, if appointment was outside the rules. Applying the ratio of
the said judgment to the facts of this case, the benefit of temporary promotion
to the appellants under regulation 30 was not admissible to them for
computation of seniority.
It was, however, urged on behalf of the appellants that the position changed
when vacancies became available in the promotion quota and the appellants came
to be regularized vide order dated 9.9.1988. By the said order, according to
the appellants, regularization took place with retrospective effect from the
dates indicated against their names and against the post earmarked for promotion
and consequently in the integrated seniority list, they were not liable to be
pushed down below direct recruits. We do not find any merit in this argument.
Under regulation 30 read with regulation 34, temporary promotees were liable to
be reverted as and when approved direct recruits became available. The
promotees were liable to be replaced by direct recruits. Under regulation 34,
the said revertees were to be considered for repromotion only against the quota
of vacancies reserved for promotees. This is clear from the terms of the order
dated 9.9.1988. In the case of U.P. Secretariat U.D.A. Association & Ors.
v. State of U.P. & Ors. Reported in [8], it has been held that a direct
recruit is to be treated as in service from the date he joins it, whereas the
promotee has to be fitted into service from the date when he becomes entitled
to fitment in accordance with the quota and rota rule prescribed under the
rules. In the case of A. N. Sehgal & Ors. v. Raje Ram Sheoram & Ors.
reported in ], one of the arguments advanced on behalf of the promotees
was that they were promoted as Executive Engineers against regular vacancies
and they continued in service without break from the respective dates of their
promotion, therefore, they were members of the service in substantive capacity
from respective dates of promotion. It was argued that the direct recruit Shri
Raje Ram was recruited long after the promotion of the appellants (promotees)
and, therefore, the promotees cannot be pushed down and placed below the direct
recruit. On examination of the rules, this Court found that recruitment to the
service was from three sources, namely, direct recruitment, promotion and by
transfer. A ratio was prescribed under rule 5(2) between the promotees and
direct recruits. The ratio was 1:1. It was held that rule 5(2) had restricted
the number of posts to promotees at 50%. Under the proviso to rule 5(2), it was
laid down that the rigour of 50% quota may be relaxed in cases where direct
recruits were not available. On reading rule 5, it was held by this Court that
a promotee within his quota under rule 5 got his seniority from the date when
the vacancy arose in his quota. It was held that the promotee occupying the
post within 50% quota of the direct recruit acquired no right to the post and
should yield to direct recruit though promoted later to him. It was held that
the seniority of the promotee has to be reckoned only from the date of
availability of the post and, therefore, he has to be placed below his
immediate senior promotee within the said quota.
The officiating period of the promotee between the date of initial promotion
and the date of availability of vacancy would stand excluded. A direct recruit
on promotion within his quota, though later to the promotee is interposed in
between the periods and interjects the promotee's seniority; he snaps the links
in the chain of continuity and steals a march over the promotee. It has been
further held that the rule of quota is a statutory rule and must be strictly
implemented. The result of pushing down the promotees may work hardship but it
is unavoidable as it would nullify otherwise the statutory rules. # In the
case of U.P. Secretariat U.D.A. Association (supra), it has been held by this
Court that mere inaction on the part of the government cannot be made ground to
contend that the quota rule has broken down. In the present case, in the
absence of direct recruitment, the appellants could not have got seniority over
direct recruits. Where there is inaction on the part of the Government or
employer or imposed ban on direct recruitment in filling up the posts meant for
direct recruits, it cannot be held that the quota has broken down. #
Before concluding, it may be pointed out that in the present case, the impugned
seniority list is dated 10.11.1994 whereas regulation 34 has been amended
w.e.f. 15.9.1995. Therefore, reliance placed on the amended regulation 34 by
the appellants is incorrect.
For the aforestated reasons, we do not find any merit in the above civil
appeals and the same are dismissed accordingly, with no order as to costs.