SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M/s. H.V. Industrial Electronics Private Limited
Vs
Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs
Appeal (Civil) 4436 of 2001 (Ca No. 4439 of 2001, Ca No. 4437 of 2001 and Ca No. 4438 of 2001)
(Ashok Bhan and Markandeya Katju, JJ)
20.07.2006
ASHOK BHAN, J.
The common question for consideration in these four appeals by the Commissioner
of Central Excise & Customs, Aurangabad (for short "the
respondent") is to the classification of "power controllers"
manufactured by each of the four appellants to these appeals.
The appellants inter alia are manufacturers of electrical goods namely, power
controllers also known as Light Dimmers and Heat Controllers. Until June, 1991,
the appellants had classified the "power controllers" under Chapter
85, Sub-heading 8543.00 under the Central Excise Tariff Act (for short
"the Tariff Act"). With effect from 25.07.1991, the appellants
started classifying "power controllers" under Sub-heading 8536.90.
The Department did not accept the classification list and issued show cause
notices dated 1.6.1992, 5.11.1992, 3.5.1993 and 4.10.1993, respectively to the
fourth respondent herein inter alia alleging that the correct classification of
the "power controllers" is under Sub-heading 8543.00 and not under
Sub-heading 8536.90. Identical show cause notices proposing to deny the
proposed classification by the appellant and confirm the classification earlier
claimed and approved were issued, the notices also proposed recovery of duty
short paid, caused by the difference between the duty payable under each of the
two headings. The said show cause notices made allegation relating to valuation
of goods as well, but the subject matter of these appeals is restricted to the
issue of the determination of classification of "power controllers".
The respondent submitted their reply to the show cause notice vide letters
dated 22.4.1992, 22.6.1992, 19.11.1992 and 31.5.1993. It was submitted by them
that the power controllers/light dimmers are for controlling the flow of power
and for the purpose of protecting the circuit of 230 AC Voltage from 150 Watts
to 3000 Watts and therefore the said items fell under Sub-heading 8536.90 and
not under Sub-heading 8543.00 which was a residuary item relating to electrical
machine having individual functions not specified or included elsewhere in
Chapter 85.
The Assistant Collector by his order-in- original bearing No. 84/93 dated
31.12.1993 confirmed the classification of "power controllers" under
Sub-heading 8543.00 and the difference in duty demanded. The appellants filed
statutory appeals before the Collector of Central Excise & Customs
(Appeals) challenging the order of the respondent on the grounds set out in the
appeal. The Collector (Appeals) by his order-in-appeal No. A-371/94 dated
31.12.1994, after recording a finding that the product manufactured by the
appellants is used for making connection to or in electrical circuits held that
the goods are classifiable under Sub-heading 8536.90 as it was for Voltage not
exceeding 1000 Volts.
Being aggrieved against the order-in-appeal, the Department filed an appeal
before the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal
Bench at Mumbai (for short "the Tribunal"). Tribunal by the impugned
order accepted the appeal filed by the Department, set aside the order of the
Collector (Appeals) and restored the order of the Assistant Controller. It has
been held in the impugned order that the function of "power
controllers" is to provide a source of current variable at the option of
the user to the load to which it is connected. That it performs individual
functions and hence would fall under Heading 85.43.
Being aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal, the appellants have filed
the present appeals.
Counsels for the parties have been heard at length. Headings 85.36 and 85.43
relied upon by the parties read as follows:
"85.36 - Electrical apparatus for switching or protecting electrical
circuits, or for making connections to or in electrical circuits (for example,
switches relays, fuses, surge suppressors, plugs, sockets, lamp- holders,
junction boxes) for a voltage not exceeding 1000 volts.
85.36.10 - Overload protection or thermal relay, starting relay controls, for
refrigerating or air conditioning appliances and machinery.
8536.90 - Other"
"85.43 - Electrical machines and apparatus, having individual functions
not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter."
Heading 85.36 covers electrical apparatus for switching or protecting
electrical circuits, or for making connections to or in electrical circuits,
such as, switches, relays, fuses, surge suppressors, plugs, sockets,
lamp-holders, junction boxes for a voltage not exceeding 1000 volts.
The assessee-appellant has not shown any technical write-up to substantiate
their claim to the effect that the items produced by them perform the function
of either switching, protecting or for making connections to or in electrical
circuit. Heading 85.43 covers electrical machines or apparatus having
individual functions not specified or included elsewhere in the Chapter. The
"power controllers" do not either switch or protect or for make
connections to or in electrical circuits. Its only function is to control the
degree of illumination and outflow of heat, i.e., it functions as a light
dimmer and speed controller. Its function is to control the degree of
illumination and flow of electric current. The apparatus whose function is to
control the degree of illumination and flow of current has not been mentioned
in either of the entries of Chapter 85. It performs individual function. The
fact that the use of product manufactured by the respondent is to regulate the
flow of electricity to the object in question, the same cannot be treated as an
apparatus for making or protecting switching or making connections to or in
electrical circuits. The machine/ apparatus manufactured by the appellant is
for controlling or regulating the electric current/power so as to feed the
required quantum of current to the other equipments connected to the circuits.
Apparatus "power controller" is capable of controlling the
current/power in the circuit and therefore, definitely performs the individual
function. Such machine or apparatus would fall under residuary entry 85.43 and
not under 85.36.
Rejecting the contention of the assessee that the power controllers would not
fall under Heading 85.36, the Tribunal has recorded the following findings:
"Both headings are a reproduction of respective headings in the Harmonized
System of Nomenclature (HSN) and reference to the Explanatory Notes of that
nomenclature in determining the scope of the coverage of these headings is
justified. Heading 85.36 speaks of Electrical apparatus for switching or
protecting electrical circuits, or for making connections to or in electrical
circuits." Therefore, such apparatus which is intended solely or
predominantly for any of these purposes, that would be classified under that
heading. Electrical apparatus which are intended to perform other functions,
and incorporating a switch, relay, fuse, or plug, cannot, solely by the fact of
such incorporation, be considered to be apparatus for switching or protecting
electrical circuits. If that were to be the case, every apparatus that incorporates
a switch or fuse or other item mentioned in the heading would be classifiable
under that heading. Thus, transformers, electric lamps or television receivers
incorporating a fuse or the fuse to protect against overload, or a switch to
turn on the circuit would be classifiable not under headings 85.04, 85.39 or
85.28 respectively but would be classifiable under heading 85.36. The absurdity
of this conclusion shows the unacceptability of the reasoning advanced in its
support. It is clear that heading 85.36 is for goods solely or essentially used
for the purpose specified in that heading switching or protecting electric
circuit, or making connection or any switch circuits. This article therefore
cannot be classifiable under heading 85.36."
The Tribunal further examined the appropriateness of the classification claimed
by the assessee under Heading 85.43. It came to the conclusion that the
electrical appliances or apparatus under consideration has individual functions
as it does the function of controlling/regulating the electric current/power so
as to feed the required quantum of current to the other equipments connected to
the circuits. Its function is to provide a source of current variable at the
option of the user to the load to which it is connected. We agree with both the
findings referred to above by the Tribunal.
For the reasons stated above, we do not find any merit in this appeal and
dismiss the same, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.