SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Nathu @ Paras Ram
Vs
State of Rajasthan
Appeal (Crl.) 1004 of 2006
(S. B. Sinha and Dalveer Bhandari, JJ)
31.10.2006
S.B.SINHA, J.
Perused the report of the Registrar (Judicial) dated 26.09.2006. The special leave petition was filed on 10.06.2004, which was sent by one Nathu @ Parasram, who is in custody. He had sent a copy of the judgment passed by the High Court. The record was, however, put up on 04.09.2006.
It is in the aforementioned premise that an inquiry was directed to be
conducted. The Registrar (Judicial), in his report, inter alia, stated that the
office had sent for the records of the courts below which caused delay.
Our attention in this behalf has been drawn to Order XXI Rule 8 of the Supreme
Court Rules, 1966+, relevant portion whereof is in the following terms :
"8. (1) If the petitioner is in jail and is not represented by an advocate
on record he may present his petition for special leave to appeal together with
the certified copy of the Judgment and any written argument which he may desire
to advance to the officer-in-charge of the jail, who shall forthwith forward
the same to the Registrar of this Court. Upon receipt of the said petition, the
Registrar of the Court shall, whenever necessary call, from the proper officer
of the Court or the Tribunal appealed from, the relevant documents for
determination of the petition for special leave to appeal.
(2) As soon as all necessary documents are available the Registrar shall,
assign an Advocate from a panel of amicus curiae and thereafter place the
petition and complete documents for hearing before the Court. The fee of the
advocate so engaged shall be Rs.250/- upto the admission stage and a lump sum
not exceeding Rs.500/- for the hearing of the appeal arising therefrom, as may
be fixed by the Bench hearing the appeal, and in an appropriate case, the Bench
hearing the case may for the reasons to be recorded in writing, sanction
payment of a lump sum not exceeding Rs.750/-."
Rules framed by this Court must be read in consonance with the fundamental
rights of the prisoners. A prisoner when sends a petition or an appeal from
jail, the same requires immediate attention of this Court. The Court while entertaining
a special leave petition having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
case, may suspend his sentence or allow his prayer for bail. Each petition is
accompanied by a copy of the judgment of the High Court, which is supplied free
of charge to the prisoners. It does not, therefore, appear to be reasonable
that in each and every case when the matter is being placed before the
Registry, the records would be sent for and when they are in vernacular
language, the same would be translated into English.
The Rule no doubt permits the Registrar to call for documents, but the same is
required to be done only when the same is found to be necessary and not
otherwise.
Records of the case should not, thus, be called for in a mechanical manner.
We, therefore, direct that when the special leave petitions are forwarded
through the officer-in-charge of the jail along with certified copy of the
judgment, the same should urgently be placed before the Court. The first
listing of the case should not be delayed. At best an office note be placed
that the translated copy of the records has not been sent; and if the records
are directed to be called for, the same are required to be translated. It is
only in cases where records are required to be called for, the same should be
done; as otherwise it may await the order of the Court. We direct the Registry
to act in terms of this order in future.