KERALA HIGH COURT
Babu Joseph
Vs
State of Kerala
(M.P.Menon,J.)
27.09.1984
JUDGEMENT
M.P.Menon,J.
( 1. ) A question of some importance,as to the status of territorial waters in the constitutional law of India and the competence of coastal States to regulate fishing in such waters,is raised in these two writ petitions challenging the validity of the Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act,1980(Act 10/81.)
( 2. ) FISHING in the coastal waters with the aid of country crafts,canoes and
catamarams has been the traditional occupation and source of livelihood for
many fishermen communities in the State.With the dawn of independence and the
emphasis on all -round development through Five -Year Plans,steps were taken to
expand marine fishing by introducing mechanised boats and trawlers using more
sophisticated gears and technologies.The Indo Norwegian Project sponsored by
the State Government marked the beginning of this process.Private enterprise
soon stepped into the area,introducing all sorts of mechanised vessels and
gears,and setting up peeling sheds,ice factories and freezing plants.And a
conflict soon arose,as often happens with modernisation,between the old and the
new,the fishermen communities complaining that they were being squeezed out of
existence in an unfair competition.Proests and agitations followed,occasionally
developing into clashes between these two groups in the territorial sea.The
developments in the other coastal states must also have been on similar
lines,because by 1976,the Central Government became seized of the problem and
appointed the Majumdar Committee to examine the question of demarcating
separate areas for different types of fishing boats and vessels.Even without
waiting for the report of the Committee the Centre advised the concerned
States,as an interim measure,to set apart waters up to 5 kilometres from the
shore for the exclusive use of traditional crafts.And after receipt of the
report,a model bill for giving legislative protection to the policy was also
forwarded to the States,some time in 1979.The Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation
Ordinance,1980 was promulgated to give effect to the above advice.The impugned
Act replaced the Ordinance,with the assent of the President,with retrospective
effect from 29 -11 -80. S.4(1)of the Act empowered the State Government,by
orders notified in the Gazette,to regulate,restrict or prohibit,in specified
areas,fishing by prescribed classes of vessels,catching of specified classes of
fish,use of prescribed fishing gears etc .,after taking into account the
matters specified in Sub -s.( 2 ).'Specified area was defined in S.2(h)as such
area in the sea along the entire coast line of the State,but not beyond
territorial waters,as may be specified by the Government,by notification in the
Gazette ;. 'State 'was defined in S.2(i)to include the territorial waters
along the entire coast line of Kerala.In November and December,1980 Government
issued a series of notifications under S.2(h)and S.4(1 ).Stated briefly,the
combined effect of the these notifications was: - (i)to prohibit use of
purse seine,ring seine,pelagic trawl and mid water trawl fishing gears in the
territorial waters along the coast line of the State; (ii)to prohibit fishing
by all mechanised vessels in the territorial waters,except for certain small
specified zones;and (iii)permit fishing,by way of exemption,in part of the
prohibited area,by motorised country crafts ;. The grievance of the
petitioners who are owners of mechanised vessels using the prohibited types of
gears,is that the Act and the notifications issued thereunder have the result
of destroying their occupation or trade.
( 3. ) THE validity of the Act as a whole is challenged on two major grounds: (i)Entry
21 List II of the VIIth Schedule of the Constitution authorises the State to
legislate only on 'fisheries 'and not on 'fishing '; the impugned Act is a law
on fishing; (ii)Territorial waters do not form part of the territory of
the State;and under Art.245(1 ),the State has no competence to make a law
having extra territorial operation. ;