1986 INSC 0285
                                                     State of A. P.

                                                           Vs

                                            T. Nandagopal and Another

                               Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 10906 of 1986

                                                      08.09.1986

                                                        ORDER

1. Normally, this Court does not interfere with interlocutory orders of this nature except under very
exceptional circumstances. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no reason for us to
depart from this well settled practice. Obviously, the High Court could not have prejudge the whole
issue involved in the writ petition which is still to be heard on merits. We, therefore, made the
impugned order subject to the result of the writ petition and without prejudice to the rights and
contentions of the parties. Learned counsel for the State Government seeks two weeks time to
implement the impugned order of the High Court. We grant two weeks time to the State
Government to implement the direction made by the High Court as prayed for.

2. We hope and trust that the High Court will endeavour to dispose of the writ petition on merits, as
expeditiously as possible; and, in any event, not later than four weeks from today.

3. Special leave petition is accordingly disposed of.

Court Master.

</html