1997 INSC 0336
                                         SUREME COURT OF INDIA

                                                     M.C. Mehta

                                                           Vs.

                                                Union of India (Uoi)

                                       (K Ramaswamy and S S Ahmad JJ.)

                                                      17.03.1997

                                                       ORDER

1. We have heard all the counsel. Mr M.C. Mehta, petitioner-in-person filed the application seeking
directions (i) to take action against the authorities responsible for damaging and destroying the
green belt within 500 metres of Taj Mahal; (ii) to direct the State of U.P. to shift the venue of Yanni
concert beyond 500 metres from the Taj Mahal as recommended by the Expert Committee of the
Central Pollution Control Board; (iii) to direct the Union of India and the State of U.P. not to allow
any vehicles, generators or sound equipments within 500 metres of Taj Mahal. (iv) He also sought
for direction to constitute a committee to take necessary steps to protect the green belt as directed by
this Court on the earlier occasion.

2. Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, the learned Additional Advocate General of U.P. has stated that he and the
Additional Solicitor General personally inspected the site at which Yanni has set up the venue for
organising the sound show and a photograph has been placed before us showing that it was across
River Yamuna in the sand belt wherein there is no green belt existing and does not exist and that,
therefore, there will not be any effect on the Taj Mahal by organising the show. He also suggested
that they have given directions that on the eastern side of the Taj Mahal at Shilpgram the vehicles
would stop at a distance of 750 m. From there, the visitors would be taken by battery-operated buses
up to a distance of 200 m away from the bridge and from there they would go by walk. The buses
would stop beyond 200 m from the bridge. On the western side, all the vehicles would stop at the
Red Fort and from there the visitors would be taken by buses up to a distance of 600 m away from
the Taj Mahal outer wall. From there the visitors would go by walk. It is also stated that there is no
damage to the existing green belt. Presently there is no access into the green belt by the visitors.
Therefore, the apprehension of the petitioner that the green belt will get damaged is not correct.

3. In view of the above statement, we accept the undertaking given on behalf of the State of U.P.
that the visitors coming from the eastern side of the Taj Mahal would stop their vehicles at a
distance of 750 m of Shilpgram. From there the visitors would be taken on battery-operated buses
up to a distance of 200 m away from the bridge. From there they would go by walk to the place of
the show. Similarly the visitors coming from the western side would stop their vehicles at Red Fort
and from there they would be taken by buses up to a distance of 600 m away from the outer wall of
the Taj Mahal. From there all the visitors would go by walk. No visitor would visit within the green
belt as existing today. Thereby there would not be any damage to the green belt by virtue of the
concert or visitors or visitors' vehicles.

4. With a view to effectively ensure compliance thereof, we are of the view that an officer from the
Archaeological Survey of India, one officer from the Agra Development Authority, one officer from
the Central Pollution Control Board, one from the NEERI and one officer from the Ministry of
Environment and Forests, Government of India would be constituted as a Committee. They will
strictly monitor the above directions and they would also monitor the pollution to the Taj Mahal on
account of sound or air pollution. With regard to the air pollution during night as per Schedule III of
the Environmental Protection Rule, 1986, Ambient Air Quality Standards in respect of noise during
silence zone, it should not exceed 40 decibels (db).

5. If there is any difficulty in this behalf, the Committee is at liberty to approach this Court for
necessary directions. As soon as the show is over, the bridge constructed would be removed one
week thereafter. During this period, the Taj Mahal will not be open for any of the visitors during
night-time. The State Government is directed to provide appropriate security for monitoring the
environment. The Committee would assess any damage, if any, that would be done to the Taj Mahal
so that in future necessary steps be taken to avoid damage and to prevent such damages in future to
the Taj Mahal. The application is disposed of accordingly.

6. Compliance report be submitted within two weeks. If any damage is caused, to the Taj Mahal due
to the sound or air pollution, that would be considered after the report is submitted by the
Committee as constituted earlier and appropriate directions would be given in that behalf.