1995 INSC 1075
                                            Sabir Hussain and Another
                                                           Vs

                                     State of U.P. and OthersVirendra Singh
                                                           Vs

                                              State of U.P. and Others
                                       Civil Appeals Nos. 3487-88 of 1979
                                      (K. Ramaswamy, S. B. Majmudar JJ)

                                                      30.11.1995
                                                        ORDER

1. Though the case has been called twice, the appellants are not present in person. We have taken the
assistance of Shri K.S. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The controversy raised in this case is covered by the judgment of this Court in Ramesh Chand v.
State of U.P. where this Court had held that :

                  "Failure to specify the number of services would not invalidate the draft scheme
                  under Section 68-C or the approved scheme under Section 68-D of the Motor
                  Vehicles Act, 1939."
Same is the question in these appeals also. Under these circumstances, the omission to specify the
number of services in the approved scheme does not invalidate the scheme already approved.
3. The appeals are accordingly dismissed but in the circumstances without costs.