1996 INSC 0895
                                    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                            University of Delhi

                                                      Vs.

                                         Anand Vardhan Chandal

                                          C.A. No. 2163 of 1978

     (Kuldip Singh,CJ. M.M. Punchhi and N.P. Singh, JJ. M.K. Mukharjee and S. Saghi
                                                 Ahmad, JJ.)

                                                 09.07.1996

                                                JUDGMENT
Kuldip Singh,CJ.
1. A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court posed the following question for its
considerations:

        "Is there a fundamental right to education to be spelt out of clauses (a), (b) and (c)
        of Article 19(1) and Article 21 of the Constitution? Does it include participation by a
        student in the activities of the University Student's Union ? Does the denial of this
        right to petitioner by the University sustain this petition under Article 226(1)(a) of the
        Constitution ? These some what novel questions arise in this Writ Petition on the
        following facts".
2. The High Court answered the first part of the question in the affirmative and has held that
the right to education is a fundamental right. This question has been finally decided by a
Constitution Bench of this Court in Unnikrishnan J.P. & Ors. Vs . State of A.P. & Ors1..
There is, therefore, no dispute that the right to education is a fundamental right to the extent it
has been spelt out by the Constitution Bench in Unnikrishnan's case.
3. So far as the student-participation in the election and other Union activities is concerned,
the Division Bench has held the same to be a part of the fundamental right to education on
the following reasoning:
        "Once the University admits a student, it becomes its duty to educate him or give him
        equal opportunity with others to educate himself. Since the participation in the Union
        activities is a part of the total education given by the University equal opportunity has

1AIR 1992 SC 716

        to be given to all students to participate in the Union activities. It is necessary to
        ensure, therefore, that the students after being admitted will have a reasonable time to
        join the students Union including elections to it......... The action of the University
        authorities firstly in fixing the date of the commencement of the year and secondly in

1998(5)SCALE23                                                    SpotLaw

                                                               1
        rejecting the petitioner's nomination paper resulted therefore, in the denial of the
        exercise of the fundamental right to education by the petitioner".
4. We are of the view that the High Court fell into patent error in holding that once the
University admits a student, the right to contest the Students of Union elections is a part of
the right to education and as such is a fundamental right. This Court in N.P. Ponnuswamy
Vs2 Returning Officer, Namakkal has authoritatively held that right to participate in elections
to the State Assemblies and the Parliament is not a fundamental right. It is only a statutory
right. Participation in the Students- Union activities including elections cannot be placed on a
higher pedestal.
5. We, therefore, allow this appeal and set aside the impugned Judgment of the High Court.
No costs.

2[1952] 1 SCR 218

1998(5)SCALE23                                                    SpotLaw

                                                               2