2000 INSC 0107
                                        SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                                     Jai Pal Singh

                                                           Vs.

                                             Chief Settlement Commr.

                                                C.A.No.488 of 2000

                            (S. P. Bharucha, S. S. M. Quadri and M. B. Shah, JJ.)

                                                      21.01.2000

                                                       ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The notice on the special leave petition stated that the matter might be disposed of at this stage by
an order restoring the appeal to the file of the High Court to be heard and disposed of on merits,
condoning the delay in filing it.

3. The delay was of about 170 days. The explanation relates to the illness of the mother of the
appellants and the expenses incurred thereon. The High Court took the view that the delay had not
been satisfactorily explained. It added that even on merits it did not find any ground to interfere.
Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that all the grounds in the special leave petition were
directed to the merits and there was no averment in regard to the refusal to condone the delay.
4. We do not think that, in the circumstances, that can be a reason to decline to pass the order that
seems to us appropriate. We think that the appropriate course that the High Court should have
passed and which we propose to do, was to condone the delay and make an order of costs in favour
of the respondents.

5. Accordingly, the civil appeal is allowed. The order under appeal is set aside. Delay in filing the
appeal before the High Court is condoned and the appeal (L.P.A. No. 202 of 1997) is restored to the
file of the High Court to be heard and disposed of on merits.

6. The appellants shall pay to the respondents the costs of the appeal, quantified at Rupees five
hundred only.

Order accordingly.