2003 INSC 0654
                                    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                                 Ram Kishan

                                                      Vs.

                                                  Raj Kumar

                                           C.A.No.2963 of 2000

                                  (M.B.Shah and A.R.Lakshmanan JJ.)

                                                 18.08.2003

                                                   ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the
respondent-State states that the respondents have complied with the directions issued by this
Court. Accordingly, they have prepared the seniority list and intimated to the petitioner his
position in the seniority and have also prepared the Register as directed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, disputes the said submission.

3. Considering the dispute, in our view, the contempt proceeding is not the proper remedy. If
respondents have not followed the directions, it would be open to the petitioner to file fresh
petition for the remaining grievance.

4. Hence, this petition for initiation contempt proceedings is dismissed. Contempt Notice
discharged.

1  SpotLaw