2004 INSC 0156
                                    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                                 Md. Manjur

                                                      Vs.

                                     Shyam Kunj Occupants' Society

                                           C.A.No.7502 of 2002

                           (D. M. Dharmadhikari and Shivaraj V. Patil JJ.)

                                                 04.02.2004

                                                   ORDER

1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties on either side, we cant find fault with the
impugned judgment inasmuch as, in the impugned judgment, judgment of this Court in Som
Vihar Apartment Owners' Housing Maintenance Society Ltd. v. Workmen do. Indian Engg.
& Gent. Mazdoor [ 00] is relied on and followed. Learned counsel for the appellants tried to
make some distinction to contend that the decision of this Court afore-mentioned is not
applicable to the facts of the present case, We find it difficult to agree. This being the
position, we do not find any merit in the appeal. Consequently, it is dismissed. No costs.

2. At this stage, the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants have
made an application, i.e., I.A. No. 3, for direction to give minimum wages and for other
reliefs. Since this is outside the purview of this appeal, it will not be possible for us to give
any direction In this application. Hence, I.A. No. 3 is dismissed. However, we make it clear
that the dismissal of this I.A. does not preclude the appellants from making a proper
application, if entitled to, in regard to the reliefs sought for in this application before an
appropriate authority in accordance with law.

1  SpotLaw