2004 INSC 0422
                                    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                                Rattan Chand

                                                      Vs.

                                                  Kala Devi

                                           C.A.No.1378 of 1998

                                  (Brijesh Kumar and Arun Kumar JJ.)

                                                 01.04.2004

                                                   ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. No one appears for the respondents though
served.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the High Court has gone into the question
of fact and has upset the findings of fact recorded by the First Appellate Court. It is also
indicated that no substantial question of law was formulated while admitting or deciding the
second appeal.

3. It appears that the suit filed by the respondents was dismissed but the First Appellate Court
had decreed the suit of the plaintiff. The Judgment of the First Appellate Court has been set
aside in second appeal. We feel that it was necessary to have formulated a question of law in
compliance of Section 100(4) CPC. The Learned counsel for the appellant has referred to the
decisions of this Court in Md. Mohammad Ali (dead) by L.Rs. vs. Jagadish Kalita & ors. ,
Janki Narayan Bhoir vs. Narayan Namdeo Kadam 4 and Kanhaiyalal & ors. vs. Anupkumar
& ors. 6.

4. In view of the position indicated above, we allow the appeal, set aside the Judgment and
Order passed by the High Court and remand the matter for deciding the second appeal after
formulating substantial question of law arising for consideration in the second appeal.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant for about half an hour.

6. The appeal is allowed, the Judgment and order passed by the High Court is set and the
matter is remanded for deciding the second appeal in terms of the signed order.

1  SpotLaw