2004 INSC 0721
                                    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                              N. Venkateshaiah

                                                      Vs.

                                                  P.V. Naik

                                          C.A. No. 3152 of 1998

                                  (B. N. Agarwal and H. K. Sema JJ.)

                                                 15.07.2004

                                                   ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal has been filed against judgment rendered by the Karnataka High Court in a
contempt proceeding whereby appellant has been convicted under Section 12 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of
three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 5, 000/- and in default, to undergo further simple
imprisonment for a period of two months. Apart from that, Rs. 1, 000/- has been awarded as
cost of litigation. In the present case, the contempt alleged is of order dated 5.3.1997 passed
by the High Court in Writ Appeal No. 1608 of 1994 whereby the petitioner therein was
directed to pay a sum of Rs. 50, 000/- to the respondent without fixing any time for its
payment.

3. In view of facts stated hereinabove, we do not propose to go into the merit of this appeal
as to whether in cases where no time limit is fixed for compliance of the order, a party can be
said to have disobeyed order of the Court merely by non-payment in view of the fact that the
amounts of Rs. 50, 000/-, fine of Rs. 5, 000/- and cost of Rs. 1, 000/- have been already paid
to the respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, we are of the view that
it would be just and expedient to set aside the impugned order and drop the contempt
proceeding.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the contempt
proceeding is dropped. No costs.

1  SpotLaw