2004 INSC 0944
                                    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                        Suman Madhavrao Ambre

                                                      Vs.

                                     Anilkumar Damodar Paithankar

                                      S.L.P. (C) No. 17071 of 2004

                                  (B. N. Agarwal and H. K. Sema JJ.)

                                                 30.08.2004

                                                   ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petition
is, accordingly, dismissed.

3. It appears that the eviction proceeding commenced in the year 1991 on the ground of
reasonable and bona fide requirement of the landlord. In view of this, we are of the view that
it is unfortunate that the litigation has remained pending for 13 years. Now it is high time that
the respondent must get vacant possession of the premises in question. Accordingly, the
Executing Court, upon filing of an application for execution, shall see that vacant possession
of the premises in question is made over to the respondent within a period of two months
from today and if for execution of order of eviction any armed force is necessary, the
concerned Superintendent of Police shall see that the same is deputed within 48 hours from
the time requisition is received from the court concerned. While executing the order of
eviction if any other person is found to be in possession, he shall also be evicted from the
premises in question.

1  SpotLaw