2004 INSC 1054
                                    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                                 Sunil Kumar

                                                      Vs.

                                           State of Uttar Pradesh

                                          Crl.A.No.1008 of 2001

                                 (Arijit Pasayat and C. K. Thakker JJ.)

                                                 21.09.2004

                                                   ORDER

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 327 OF 2002.

1. Having heard learned counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh and having perused the
judgments of the Trial Court and the High Court, we find no infirmity in the judgments. The
Trial Court has rightly recorded conviction so far as the appellant Ravindra Singh is
concerned under Section 302 IPC and imposed life imprisonment. He has also been
convicted for an offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act. The accusations in
that regard against the appellant have also been established. The appeal is without merit and
is, accordingly, dismissed.

Criminal Appeal NO.1008 OF 2001.

2. The two appellants Sunil Kumar and Pawan Kumar were convicted under Section 302
read with Section 34 IPC. The only role ascribed to them is that they exhorted accused
Ravindra whose appeal we have dismissed. The language to commit the crime allegedly used
by the accused is not sufficient to bring application of Section 34 IPC. Their conviction was
only by applying Section 34 IPC with the substantive offence under Section 302 IPC. We do
not consider this to be a fit case where Section 34 IPC can be applied. # The conviction is,
accordingly, set aside in case of each of the appellants. The appellants who are in custody,
shall be set at liberty forthwith unless required to be in custody in connection with any other
case.

3. The appeal is accordingly allowed.

1  SpotLaw