2008 INSC 1549
                                    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                          P.S.Ramakrishna Reddy

                                                       Vs

                                Authorised Officer, Land Reforms, A.P

                                       C.A.Nos.3888-3889 of 2001

                                 (Tarun Chatterjee and Aftab Alam JJ.)

                                                  15.07.2008

                                                   ORDER

1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 7th of
December, 1999 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in
Civil Revision Petition Nos.1662 and 1663 of 1995.

2. The High Court, while dismissing the civil revision case, solely relied on a decision of
the Division Bench of that High Court, namely, U.Sarat Kumar vs. Authorised Officer,
Land Reforms1. The aforesaid decision of the High Court in U.Sarat Kumar's case has been
affirmed by this Court in the case of Makineni Venkata Sujatha vs. Land Reforms Tribunal
& Anr.2. Since the question raised before the High Court as well as before us is now covered
by the aforesaid decision of this Court reported in 2000 (8) SCC 196, there is no question to
interfere with the impugned judgment.

3. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs. The interim order, if
any, stands vacated. The lower court record if lying in this Registry, the same may be sent
back at an early date.

11998 (1) A.L.T. 496
22000 (8) SCC 196

1  SpotLaw