2011 INSC 0760
                        SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                               M.C. Mehta

                               Vs.

                        Union of India (UOI)

                        (V.S. Sirpurkar and G.S. Singhvi JJ.)

                               14.07.2011

                               JUDGMENT

I.A. Nos. 2447-2448:

1. Mr. Rajiv Dutta, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant submits that
he has been provided only copy of the report No. 80 of the Monitoring Committee
and prays that the copy of the report Nos. 55, 75 and 88 of the Monitoring
Committee may be supplied to him. He further seeks time to file rejoinder to the
reply filed by the D.D.A.

2. Copy of the aforesaid reports of the Monitoring Committee be given to the
applicant within one week.

3. Two weeks' time is granted to the applicant to file rejoinder to the reply filed by
the D.D.A.

I.A. Nos. 2474-2475 and 2476:

4. Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant seeks
time to file rejoinder to the reply filed by D.D.A.

5. Monitoring Committee is also permitted to file rejoinder to the reply filed by
D.D.A. within two weeks from today.

I.A. No. 2348:

6. Mr. Puneet Jain, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant prays for and is
granted two weeks' time to file reply to the report of the Monitoring Committee.

Law Information Center              1                          SpotLaw
I.A. Nos. 2501, 2502 and 2509:

7. Copy of the I.As. and concerned report of the Monitoring Committee be given
the M.C.D. to file reply within two weeks from today.

8. Consideration of the replies filed by the D.D.A., M.C.D. and Delhi Government
to the Report No. 85 is deferred till the next date of hearing.

Contempt Petition (C) No. 9 of 2006:

9. At the request of learned Counsel for the applicant, list this Petition after two
weeks.

I.A. No. 2366:

10. Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicants prays
for and is granted two weeks' time to file reply to the report of the Monitoring
Committee.

IA Nos. 2206-2207:

11. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant prays for and is granted two
weeks' time to file reply to the report of the Monitoring Committee.

12. List the aforesaid I.As. and Contempt Petition (C) No. 9 of 2006 on 3.8.2011 at
2 p.m.

I.A. No. 2505-2506, 2507-2508, 2510-2511 and I.A. No. ... D. No. 56887 of 2011:

13. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Amicus Curiae very fairly makes a statements
before us suggesting that the applicants have filed certain documents in these I.As.
and the Monitoring Committee may not have the documents which have now been
filed in these I.As. Learned Amicus Curiae suggests that the applicants should
approach the Monitoring Committee along with these documents and further
affidavits, if any, and apprise the Monitoring Committee of their stand. The
Monitoring Committee is directed to hear these applicants and decide within four
weeks on the basis of the aforesaid documents.

Law Information Center  2  SpotLaw
I.A. Nos. 1531, 1791, 1846, 1828, 1829, 1830 in 1A 1531, 1834, 1868-1869, 1861,
1862, 1863, 1183, 1216, 1833, 1842, 1905, 1909, 1910 and Contempt Petition Nos.
134/2003, 82/2008 and 64 of 2007:

14. Mr. D.N. Goburdhan, learned Counsel appearing for the Delhi Government and
Delhi Pollution Control Board prays for and is granted eight weeks' time to file
reply in compliance of order dated 4.5.2011 passed by this Court.

15. List these I.As. after eight weeks.

SLP (C) No. 7239 of 2006:

16. I.A. No. 6 has been filed by the Petitioner seeking leave of the Court to
withdraw this Special Leave Petition. Permission granted. This Special Leave
Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the rights of
the Petitioner, if any.

Law Information Center  3  SpotLaw