2016 INSC 1121
                                    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                     Mahendra Chandrahansa Satav

                                                      Vs.

                                Udyam Vikas Sahakari Bank Ltd & Ors.

                                      C.A.No.11788-11789 of 2016

                                 (Kurian Joseph and R.F.Nariman,JJ.,)

                                                 05.12.2016

                                                JUDGMENT

Kurian Joseph,J.,

SLP(Civil)No.8486-8487 of 2014

1. Leave granted.

2. By agreement dated 27.10.2016, the parties have reached a settlement, settling their entire
disputes. Those consent terms have been filed before this Court by way of I.A.Nos. 9-10 of
2016.

3. Therefore, these appeals are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The impugned
judgment of the High Court in the writ petitions shall stand modified in terms of the consent
terms, referred to above.

4. In terms of the settlement, the amount lying in deposit in the Registry of this Court, along
with accrued interest, shall be disbursed to Respondent No. 1-Bank. I.A.Nos. 9-10 of 2016
are disposed of.

5. No costs.

1  SpotLaw